Phandroid made an interesting affirmation yesterday, saying that iPhone users don’t really talk about smartphones with one another.

Not only do I agree with that, but I would even go further and say that vast majority of iPhone users are not interested in smartphones, let alone what the competition does. And as I have stated before I think that stems from the fact that the iPhone caught traction with the public when it was still a dumbphone, and thus most of its users were in reality dumbphone users. I have only met ONE single iPhone user who was supposedly interested in what is going on with the other platforms but you couldn’t expect much of any kind of decent and objective discussion with him, which wasn’t surprising given the statements from him of the kind “I love you Steve Jobs!” (yes, those were his exact words).

Whenever I try to engage in a conversation with “fellow” iPhone users about smartphones I am always met with either a sheepish expression (i.e. “I have no idea what you are talking about”) or simply disinterest. I sometimes even feel embarrassed when I use my iPhone in public as I don’t want to be labeled as that clueless, “just-another-iPhone-clone”, “follow-the-crowd” individual.

In contrast, my most interesting discussions have invariably been with Android users; so yes, I absolutely agree that Android users are much more prone to strike up conversation about smartphones and OSs then iPhone users. (But to fair, WebOS users have in even more in common, but that is simply because they are as rare as the Dodo….).

One of the first things (the second, to be precise) I look for in the specs of smartphone when I want to decide on the best performing device is RAM memory, both total and ideally how much is available to the user after a soft reset.

Having enough RAM is the difference between a pleasurable user experience and an exercise in frustration: I would much rather have a phone with a little slower CPU than a RAM-starved device (and I know that from my personal experience). Given this fact alone, and when you take into account the RAM specs for the Galaxy S2 and the Sensation, 1GB vs. 768MB respectively, the decision is obvious, even more so given some reports that Sense 3.0 on the Sensation uses up half the RAM on the phone! Yet most people only look at the CPU when they compare two phones for performance, seemingly unaware of the significant slowdowns that occur when the OS has to start closing down apps in the background and then run the garbage collector due to lack of RAM memory.

So in the case of the Galaxy S2 and the Sensation, comparing CPUs is virtually pointless as far as day-to-day performance and usage is concerned. Any bottlenecks will much sooner be a result the amount of RAM available. And with the Galaxy’s RAM you can also be much more certain that your phone will be able to run future versions of Android, as it invariably grows and requires more demanding hardware (look no further than the HTC Desire and Gingerbread-update debacle, where HTC claimed that the Desire does not have the required hardware to run Gingerbread well).

Add to that the superior battery life on the Galaxy S2 and there is nothing to think about, really. And no, not even the Sensation’s qHD display nor HTC’s Watch video streaming service can make up for this.

In all, the Galaxy S2 is almost the perfect phone right now as far as the hardware goes (the only thing I would *desperately* add is a notification light!), and the other manufacturers should learn from that.



UPDATE:
I had heard about the so-called “death grip” on the Sensation but since I had not seen any evidence of it I did not include it. But then I came across this where you will be able to see it firsthand; if you still were not convinced that the Galaxy is the right choice then you should be after watching that video.

© 2011 MobileInfoPlanet Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha